Questions are being raised on the police investigation in the Radhika murder case. – File photo
Radhika Yadav, the high -profile tennis player of Gurugram in Haryana, is questioning the theory of the police on the statement of the father accused in the murder case. Criminal Lawyer, retired police officers and law experts believe that the police on the rest of the angle
,
About this case when Dainik Bhaskar When talked to law experts, many facts came out. Most of the experts directly described the police investigation as unilateral and said that the statements of the accused given to the police do not matter much in the court. What will the police do if he turns back to court? Court takes decisions based on evidence and witnesses.
In such a family murder case, if the police closes the police chapter on the same theory, then the chances of benefiting the criminal increases. Radhika’s murder has not only created a stir at the social and family level, but also from a legal point of view, the matter can become complex and controversial.
Let us know that on July 10, Tennis player Radhika Yadav was killed by her father Deepak Yadav by shooting 4 bullets in Gurugram. The father told the police that he was upset with the taunts of the daughter’s earnings. The daughter did not listen to her, so she murdered her. The police have limited their action after this statement of the accused.
Accused Deepak Yadav is currently in 14 days judicial custody. – File photo
What questions did law experts raise on police investigation …
Senior Advocate said- To make the statement of the accused dangerous Regarding the investigation of the police on this matter, Supreme Court Senior Advocate Ajay Pal says that it is dangerous to make the statement of the accused primary in the investigation of any murder case. The case requires intensive and scientific investigation, including forensic evidence, statements of witnesses and analysis of digital evidence. Relying only on the statement of the accused is a serious lapse of the legal process.
He said that this has happened in the murder case of a school in Gurugram, when the police caught the wrong person while working on the same theory. If there are flaws in the police investigation, it can be a strong base for the defense. For example, if evidence from the crime scene is not collected properly or the chain of custody was disturbed, it could affect the acceptance of the evidence in the court.
Ajay Pal said that Section 24 of the Indian Evidence Act will come in the middle of the case. If the accused says that he did not kill and did not give any such statement, he can benefit. That is, it is like connecting the car in front of the horse, not like adding a car behind the horse. It is extremely difficult that a progressive and economically rich person has killed his daughter after hearing the taunts of the people.
Senior Advocate of High Court said- I doubt the fair of investigation At the same time, Ajay Chaudhary, Senior Advocate of the High Court, says- I doubt the process of police and fairness of investigation in the Radhika murder case. The police is considering its preliminary investigation as the final. The accused Deepak Yadav claimed that he was fed up with the taunts of the villagers. This thing is not embracing anyone.
Ajay Chaudhary said- Police has questioned many people, but the scope of investigation has been mainly limited to Deepak’s statement. Did this murder happen due to family dispute, economic transactions or any other deep reasons? The police should ensure that no possibility is left out.
Retired Inspector insisted on talking to the friends and close friends of the deceased A retired inspector, who has received the award from the President, said on the condition of anonymity that when the police comes to the police in the case of accused, arms and reason and the case is inside the family, the police usually limit their scope of investigation. However, the police have the option to investigate Radhika’s mobile, social media accounts and their personal relations. Because it is possible that some digital evidences have been erased.
He said- Did the police secure the crime scene properly? Was forensic evidence analyzed correctly? Answers to these questions are necessary. If the crime scene is not immediately secured, important evidence may be destroyed. The police should talk to the mother’s statement, the girl who claims Radhika’s best friend, the person in contact with Radhika and Deepak, etc.
Police reached Radhika’s house for investigation after the murder.
Criminal Lawyer said- Iqbalia does not prove the statement accusation Manish Shandilya, Senior Criminal Lawyer of Gurugram, who is following the case from the beginning, says- I have been looking into the matter from day one. Till the charge sheet is filed, the police can investigate and do it from every angle. Because it is the jurisdiction of the police. Iqbalia statement does not prove any allegation. The investigating agency can investigate from every point of view, so that there is no doubt in proving the crime in the court.
He said that no eyewitness has come to the fore in this case, who has seen the accused shooting. The investigating agency will have to prove this case in the court by linking this case, which will include recovery of gun and bullet, finger prints, FSL reports, postmortem reports. Apart from this, CCTV footage and mobiles of the deceased should also be scrutinized. It is also important to add a stiff because there is no role in it.
Manish Shandilya said that the silence of Radhika’s mother Manju Yadav cannot be considered against her in court, as it is her constitutional right. However, it makes the investigation more complicated, as she can be an important witness.
Deepak Yadav’s friend said- no one can shoot after hearing the taunts Pawan Yadav, a president of Sector 57 Residence Welfare Association (RWA) and friend of Deepak Yadav, says that he has known Deepak for a long time, but he does not think that the reason for the murder has been told by Deepak to the police, it is true. He said- A person who loves his daughter so much and puts all his life for his career, he cannot only kill the daughter by listening to the taunts.
Now know what the police did in the case …
Accused father taunted statement According to the police, many theory may be going on from Instagram Reel to her video song for Radhika’s murder, but the police are maintained on the statement of displeasure with the accused father Deepak daughter’s earnings and displeasure over not stopping the training of tennis.
The father told the police that he was very upset for the last 15 days. While going anywhere, he felt that if 2 men also seem to talk, then they are talking about him. For this reason, he took this step after getting upset. Radhika had asked to ignore the talk of the villagers, but she could not understand this.
Police spokesperson claims- Investigation took place in the right direction In this case, police spokesperson Sandeep Kumar says that the police is satisfied with its investigation. During the remand, the SHO and the investigation officials were questioned in every way. The accused is on his statement. Therefore, checking on another angle does not mean. Yes, if a complaint comes or some new fact comes out, the police will investigate. At present, the mobile of Radhika and accused Deepak has been sent for investigation.
Police asked the people who taunted During the investigation in this case, the police called the prominent people to the police station. When asked about the taunts, everyone said that no one was taunted by Deepak. He is financially prosperous, whose monthly income was Rs 15-17 lakh. The police conduct a fair investigation, as they feel that the lamp is hiding something.
On this, the police station in -charge Vinod said that if the villagers want, they can tell the name of the person who taunted, or can give some kind of complaint. When Radhika’s father has confessed his crime in preliminary investigation, it is not right to wander the investigation on another angle.
30 lakh rupees spent on treatment The interrogation also revealed that Radhika suffered an injury to his shoulder last year. Radhika started coaching young players after being unable to play professionally. Then Deepak spent more than 30 lakh rupees on her treatment, but she could not return.
Mother said- I do not know the reason for murder Despite his father’s claim of fabric, mother Manju Yadav told the police that he did not know why the husband killed the daughter by shooting them. The mother also said that her daughter’s character was perfectly fine. He did not know anything about what the husband had resentment with the daughter. When the bullets were shot, she was lying in a separate room due to ill health. The police is also keeping the mother out of the allegations after the situation in the spot and so far.
